Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflectionHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 81/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | 50/100 | 88/100 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
386K
Completed sessions
292,484,648
6,723,666
Token share
14.4%
1.51%
Tokens
199T+245%
21T+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%55K user-weeks
74.5%7.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonBeam 1.0 501B A23B vs Jamba MiniBeam 1.0 501B A23B·Jamba Mini