Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Hy4
- Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 72/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
221K
14K
Completed sessions
2,713,711
49,542
Token share
0.19%
0.02%
Tokens
2.6T+110%
264B+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.6%9.2K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba Mini