Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.6

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10058/10081/10033/10092/100
Kimi K2.650/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark78/10032/10063/10050/10027/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$4.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.9M
44K
Completed sessions
164,081,865
157,848
Token share
51.8%
0%
Tokens
716T+2,071%
59B-87%
SEP 16NOV 10
SEP 16NOV 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
75.6%637K user-weeks
49.1%1.5K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.