Try OpenCodeTry OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Ember

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Muse EmberMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101753/100100/10069/10081/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Muse Ember100/1000/10072/10092/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.70/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0024/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
109K
41K
Completed sessions
1,318,548
554,695
Token share
0.29%
0.16%
Tokens
4T+100%
2.2T+100%
SEP 16NOV 10
SEP 16NOV 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.