Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
- Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
- Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 68/100 | 25/100 | 72/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 71/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
218K
220K
Completed sessions
2,098,414
2,728,513
Token share
0.13%
0.19%
Tokens
1.8T+100%
2.6T+100%
SEP 16NOV 10
SEP 16NOV 10
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.1%7.7K user-weeks
61.6%9.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 5.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba Mini