Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- LongCat-2.5MeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 54/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| LongCat-2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 57/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.44/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$1.32/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
952K
1.6K
Completed sessions
13,931,186
11,276
Token share
3.17%
0%
Tokens
44T-85%
31B+100%
SEP 15NOV 9
SEP 15NOV 9
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.9%59K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5·Jamba Mini